The world of Large Language Models (LLMs) is moving at an incredible pace. One day, GPT-4 is the undisputed champion; the next, Anthropic releases Claude 3, claiming top spots on leaderboards. For developers and product managers building AI-powered applications, this raises a critical question: which model is actually the best for my specific use case?
Relying on marketing claims or anecdotal evidence isn't enough. You need objective, repeatable, and comparable data. But setting up fair head-to-head performance tests is traditionally a complex and time-consuming process. You have to provision infrastructure, manage different APIs, find standardized datasets, and write evaluation code.
What if you could bypass all that complexity? What if you could conduct a comprehensive LLM performance comparison between models like GPT-4 and Claude 3 with a single API call and get a detailed report back in minutes?
With Benchmarks.do, you can. Let's show you how.
Benchmarking AI models isn't as simple as asking them the same question and seeing which answer "feels" better. A robust evaluation requires:
This is precisely the problem we built Benchmarks.do to solve. We provide AI performance testing as a simple, standardized service. No complex infrastructure required.
Benchmarks.do is an agentic workflow platform that transforms AI model evaluation into a simple API call. You define what you want to test, and our service handles the rest: executing the tests against different models and delivering a structured, shareable report.
Let's say we want to compare the performance of today's top models—Claude 3 Opus, GPT-4, Llama 3 70B, and Gemini Pro—across three common tasks: text summarization, question-answering, and code generation.
With Benchmarks.do, you don't need to write custom scripts or manage different API keys. You simply make a request to our API defining the models and tasks for your benchmark.
Our platform then executes the evaluation in the background. In just a few minutes, you get a detailed JSON report, just like this one:
{
"benchmarkId": "bmk-a1b2c3d4e5f6",
"name": "LLM Performance Comparison",
"status": "completed",
"completedAt": "2023-10-27T10:30:00Z",
"report": {
"text-summarization": {
"dataset": "cnn-dailymail",
"results": [
{ "model": "claude-3-opus", "rouge-1": 0.45, "rouge-l": 0.42 },
{ "model": "gpt-4", "rouge-1": 0.44, "rouge-l": 0.41 },
{ "model": "llama-3-70b", "rouge-1": 0.43, "rouge-l": 0.40 },
{ "model": "gemini-pro", "rouge-1": 0.42, "rouge-l": 0.39 }
]
},
"question-answering": {
"dataset": "squad-v2",
"results": [
{ "model": "claude-3-opus", "exact-match": 89.5, "f1-score": 92.1 },
{ "model": "gpt-4", "exact-match": 89.2, "f1-score": 91.8 },
{ "model": "llama-3-70b", "exact-match": 87.5, "f1-score": 90.5 },
{ "model": "gemini-pro", "exact-match": 88.1, "f1-score": 91.0 }
]
},
"code-generation": {
"dataset": "humaneval",
"results": [
{ "model": "claude-3-opus", "pass@1": 74.4, "pass@10": 92.0 },
{ "model": "gpt-4", "pass@1": 72.9, "pass@10": 91.0 },
{ "model": "llama-3-70b", "pass@1": 68.0, "pass@10": 89.5 },
{ "model": "gemini-pro", "pass@1": 67.7, "pass@10": 88.7 }
]
}
}
}
This simple JSON output is packed with valuable insights. Let's break it down:
In just a few minutes, we have a clear, data-driven picture: for these specific, industry-standard tasks, Claude 3 Opus demonstrates a slight performance edge. This is the kind of actionable intelligence you need to choose the right model and justify your decision.
Using a platform like Benchmarks.do offers more than just speed.
Choosing the right AI model shouldn't be a matter of guesswork. It should be a data-driven decision that empowers you to build the best possible product. With Benchmarks.do, you can move from uncertainty to clarity with a single API call.
EVALUATE. COMPARE. OPTIMIZE.
Stop spending weeks on manual testing and start making faster, more informed decisions today.
Visit https://benchmarks.do to get your API key and run your first benchmark!