Choosing the right Large Language Model (LLM) for your application is a critical decision. Do you need the raw reasoning power of gpt-4, the nuanced generation of claude-3-opus, or the open-source flexibility of llama-3-70b? Making this choice based on marketing claims is a shot in the dark. The only way to know for sure is to test, measure, and compare.
But here's the problem: proper AI model evaluation is notoriously complex. It involves sourcing standard datasets, setting up different environments for each model, implementing complex metrics like ROUGE-L or pass@1, and ensuring the entire process is repeatable. This isn't just a hurdle; it's a significant engineering project that distracts you from building your core product.
What if you could abstract away this complexity? What if you could offload the entire evaluation pipeline to a system of intelligent, automated agents, all triggered by a single API call? This is the core principle behind Benchmarks.do, and the technology that makes it possible is called an agentic workflow.
Before diving into the solution, let's appreciate the problem. A robust AI benchmarking process requires you to:
This is a daunting, time-consuming, and error-prone cycle. It’s a perfect candidate for automation.
At Benchmarks.do, we've transformed AI performance testing from a manual chore into a simple, API-driven service. The magic behind this is our agentic workflow platform.
Think of an agentic workflow as a team of specialized software "agents" that collaborate to complete a complex task. When you send a request to our API, you're not just hitting an endpoint; you're mobilizing a team of dedicated agents to run your benchmark.
Here's how it works:
Your journey starts with a simple API call. This is where you define what you want to achieve.
{
"benchmarkId": "bmk-a1b2c3d4e5f6",
"name": "LLM Performance Comparison",
// ... and other benchmark definitions
}
The Request Agent is the first to receive this call. It acts as the project manager, parsing your request to understand which models to test, what tasks to perform (e.g., text-summarization, code-generation), and which metrics to use.
Once the plan is set, the Request Agent tasks the Data Agent. This agent is responsible for all things data. It knows exactly where to find standard evaluation datasets like cnn-dailymail or squad-v2. It fetches the required dataset, cleans it, and formats it perfectly for the upcoming tests, ensuring every model receives the exact same prompts for a fair comparison.
This is where the heavy lifting happens. The Execution Agents are specialized operators, each trained to communicate with a specific model provider. We have an agent for the OpenAI API, another for Anthropic's, one for Google's, and so on.
These agents take the prepared data and systematically query each specified model. They manage authentication, handle API-specific nuances like rate limits, and diligently collect every single output. If you want to test your own private, fine-tuned model, you can simply provide an endpoint, and our platform will deploy a custom Execution Agent to interact with it just like any public model.
With all the model outputs collected, the Evaluation Agent takes the stage. This agent is a stickler for rules and mathematics. It compares the model outputs against the ground-truth data from the dataset. It then precisely calculates the requested performance metrics, whether it's the f1-score for question-answering accuracy or the pass@10 rate for code generation quality. This guarantees that all LLM performance scoring is standardized and objective.
Finally, the Reporting Agent gathers the scores from the Evaluation Agent. It structures all the results into a clean, comprehensive, and easy-to-parse JSON report. This report gives you a direct, at-a-glance comparison of every model you tested across every task.
{
// ...
"report": {
"code-generation": {
"dataset": "humaneval",
"results": [
{ "model": "claude-3-opus", "pass@1": 74.4, "pass@10": 92.0 },
{ "model": "gpt-4", "pass@1": 72.9, "pass@10": 91.0 }
// ... and other models
]
}
}
}
This final report is delivered back to you, completing the workflow. The entire complex, multi-step process is executed automatically, behind the scenes, giving you the clear, actionable data you need.
The agentic workflow model isn't just a technical novelty; it delivers tangible value for anyone building with AI.
Stop wrestling with evaluation scripts and start making data-driven decisions. With AI performance testing as a service, you can finally move at the speed of AI.
Ready to stop guessing and start measuring? Explore the Benchmarks.do API and run your first standardized AI benchmark in minutes.